Episode 9: The Library as State Authority, Part III

In which we finally wrap up this theme…

Episode 9 Footnotes

1. Budapest Open Access Initiative, 2023, www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/. 

2. Suber, Peter. “Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing.” Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing, 2003, web.archive.org/web/20130129061341/www.earlham.edu:80/~peters/fos/bethesda.htm.

3. Duncan, Rod. The Custodian of Marvels (The Fall of the Gas-Lit Empire Book 3). Angry Robot, 2016.

4. Alperin, Juan Pablo, et al. “Academic Review Promotion and Tenure Documents Promote a View of Open Access That Is at Odds with the Wider Academic Community.” LSE Impact Blog, The London School of Economics and Political Science, 18 July 2019,
   blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2019/07/17/academic-review-promotion-and-tenure-documents-promote-a-view-of-open-access-that-is-at-odds-with-the-wider-academic-community/.

5. Gross, P. L., and E. M. Gross. “College Libraries and Chemical Education.” Science, vol. 66, no. 1713, 28 Oct. 1927, pp. 385–389, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.66.1713.385.

6. Archambault, Éric, and Vincent Larivière. “History of the Journal Impact Factor: Contingencies and Consequences.” Scientometrics, vol. 79, no. 3, 31 Jan. 2009, pp. 635–649, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-2036-x.

7. Caine, Rachel. Sword and Pen (The Great Library Book 5). Berkley, 2019.

8. Archambault, Éric, and Vincent Larivière. “History of the Journal Impact Factor: Contingencies and Consequences.”

9. Archambault, Éric, and Vincent Larivière. “History of the Journal Impact Factor: Contingencies and Consequences.”

10. Wical, Stephanie H., and Gregory J. Kocken. “Open Access and Promotion and Tenure Evaluation Plans at the University of Wisconsin–Eau Claire.” Serials Review, vol. 43, no. 2, 2017, pp. 111–119, https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2017.1313024.

11. Duncan, Rod. The Custodian of Marvels (The Fall of the Gas-Lit Empire Book 3). Angry Robot, 2016.

12. Duncan, Rod. The Custodian of Marvels (The Fall of the Gas-Lit Empire Book 3).

13. Besançon, Lonni, et al. “Open science saves lives: Lessons from the covid-19 pandemic.” BMC Medical Research Methodology, vol. 21, no. 1, 5 June 2021, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01304-y.

14. Beninger, Peter G., et al. “Debasing the currency of science: The growing menace of Predatory Open Access Journals.” Journal of Shellfish Research, vol. 35, no. 1, 2016, pp. 1–5, https://doi.org/10.2983/035.035.0101.

15. Glasziou, Paul P, et al. “Waste in COVID-19 research.” BMJ, 12 May 2020, p. M1847, https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1847.

16. Caine, Rachel. Sword and Pen (The Great Library Book 5).

17. Beall, Jeffrey. “Predatory Journals Exploit Structural Weaknesses in Scholarly Publishing.” 4open, vol. 1, 2018, p. 1, https://doi.org/10.1051/fopen/2018001.

18. Beall, Jeffrey. “The Open-Access Movement is Not Really About Open Access.” tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, vol. 11, no. 2, 2013, pp. 589–597, https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v11i2.525.