Episode 16: Conclusion, or No More Pencils, No More Books, No More Teacher’s Dirty Looks

In which we finally emerge from the stacks…  

Episode 16 Footnotes

1. Cassuto, Leonardo. “Ph.D. Attrition: How Much Is Too Much?” The Chronicle of Higher Education, 1 July 2013, https://www.chronicle.com/article/ph-d-attrition-how-much-is-too-much/.

2. Cogman, Genevieve. The Invisible Library (The Invisible Library Book 1). Ace, 2016. 

3. Alber, Jan, et al. “Unnatural Narratives, Unnatural Narratology: Beyond Mimetic Models.” Narrative, vol. 18, no. 2, May 2010, pp. 113–136, https://doi.org/10.1353/nar.0.0042.  

4. Ryan, Marie-Laure. Possible Worlds, Artificial Intelligence, and Narrative Theory. Indiana University Press, 1991. 

5.  Sullivan, Dale L. “Keeping the Rhetoric Orthodox: Forum Control in Science.” Technical Communication Quarterly, vol. 9, no. 2, Mar. 2000, pp. 125–146, https://doi.org/10.1080/10572250009364690.  

6. Hirschman, Albert O. The Rhetoric of Reaction: Perversity, Futility, Jeopardy. Belknap Press, 2004.

7. Kirkwood, William G. “Narrative and the Rhetoric of Possibility.” Communication Monographs 59, no. 1 (March 1992): 30–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759209376247.  

8. Duncan, Rod. The Custodian of Marvels (The Fall of the Gas-Lit Empire Book 3). Angry Robot, 2016. 

9. Moher, David, et al. “Stop This Waste of People, Animals and Money.” Nature, vol. 549, no. 7670, Sept. 2017, pp. 23–25, https://doi.org/10.1038/549023a.  

10. Hackwith, A.J. The God of Lost Words (A Novel from Hell’s Library Book 3). Ace, 2021. 

11. Drabinski, Emily, et al. “Scholarly Communications and Social Justice.” Reassembling Scholarly Communications: Histories, Infrastructures, and Global Politics of Open Access, edited by Martin Paul Eve and Jonathan Gray, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2020, pp. 41–52. 

12. Caine, Rachel. Ash and Quill (The Great Library Book 3). Berkley, 2017. 

13. Stanley, Christine A. “When Counter Narratives Meet Master Narratives in the Journal Editorial-Review Process.” Educational Researcher, vol. 36, no. 1, Jan. 2007, pp. 14–24, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X0629800.  

14. Eggertson, L. “Lancet Retracts 12-year-old Article Linking Autism to MMR Vaccines.” Canadian Medical Association Journal, vol. 182, no. 4, 8 Feb. 2010, https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.109-3179. 

15. “About Us.” The Lancet, www.thelancet.com/about-us. 

16. Eggertson

17. Hodgson, Humphrey. “A Statement by the Royal Free and University College Medical School and the Royal Free Hampstead NHS Trust.” The Lancet, vol. 363, no. 9411, Mar. 2004, p. 824, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(04)15711-5. 

18. Eggertson

19. Beall, Jeffrey. “Predatory Journals Threaten the Quality of Published Medical Research.” Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, vol. 47, no. 1, Jan. 2017, pp. 3–5, https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2017.0601.  

20. Hackwith, A.J. The Archive of the Forgotten (A Novel from Hell’s Library Book 2). Ace, 2020.

21. Radford, Gary P., and Marie L. Radford. “Libraries, Librarians, and the Discourse of Fear.” The Library Quarterly, vol. 71, no. 3, July 2001, pp. 299–329, https://doi.org/10.1086/603283. 

22. Duncan, Rod. Unseemly Science (The Fall of the Gas-Lit Empire Book 2). Angry Robot, 2015.

23. Cogman, Invisible Library

24. Beall, Jeffrey. “The Open-Access Movement Is Not Really About Open Access.” tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, vol. 11, no. 2, 9 Dec. 2013, pp. 589–597, https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v11i2.525. 

25. Iverson, Sandy. “Librarianship and Resistance.” Questioning Library Neutrality: Essays from Progressive Librarian, edited by Alison Marie Lewis, Library Juice Press, Duluth, MN, 2008, pp. 25–30.

26. Caine, Rachel. Smoke and Iron (The Great Library Book 4). Berkley, 2018.